ABSTRACT
Introduction: STEMI is one of the cardiac emergencies whose management has been mostly challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients presenting with the "lethal combo" of STEMI and concomitant SARS-CoV- 2 infection have faced dramatic issues related to need for self-isolation, systemic inflammation with multi-organ disease, and difficulties to obtain timely diagnosis and treatment. Method(s):We performed a systematic search of three electronic databases from February 1st 2020 to January 31st 2022. We included all studies reporting crude rates of in-hospital outcomes of STEMI patients with concomitant COVID-19. Result(s): A total of 9 observational studies were identified, mainly conducted during the first wave of the pandemic. STEMI patients with COVID -19 were more likely Afro-American and displayed higher rates of hypertension and diabetes with lower smoking prevalence. Associated comorbidities, including coronary artery disease, prior stroke and chronic kidney disease were also more common in those with SARS-CoV-2 infection. At coronary angiography, a higher thrombus burden in COVID-19 positive STEMI patients was highlighted, with up to 10-fold higher rates of stent thrombosis and greater need for glycoprotein IIb/IIa inhibitors and aspiration thrombectomy;this was not always associated with prolonged times from symptom onset to hospital admission and door-to-balloon. COVID-19 positive STEMI patients were less likely to receive coronary angiography and primary PCI, and more likely to be treated with fibrinolytics only. At the same time, patients with Covid-19 were more prone to present MINOCA. In-hospital mortality ranged from 15% to 40%, with consistent variability across different studies and subjects who tested positive for SARS-CoV- 2 did also present higher rates of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, prolonged ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, major bleeding, and stroke. Conclusion(s): The coexistence of STEMI and COVID-19 was associated with increased in-hospital mortality and poor short-term prognosis. This was not entirely attributable to logistic issues determining delayed coronary revascularization, since patients' specific clinical and angiographic characteristics, including higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors and greater coronary thrombogenicity might have substantially contributed to this trend. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infection has profound effects on endothelial and immune cell function and coagulation, and better understanding of these events in COVID-19 would allow for targeted cardiovascular treatment and followup. Method(s): Longitudinal observational study of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to hospital at two UK sites. Patients were enrolled within 96 hours of admission, with sampling up to day 29. RNAstabilised whole blood was processed for mRNA sequencing. Gene expression levels were compared between patients who did and did not suffer a major cardiac event (MACE) from admission to 1-year post-hospitalization. Result(s): At day 1, in acute COVID-19, no differences in gene expression were observed between those with (n=23) and without (n=140) a MACE. However, 93 significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs;adjusted pvalue<0.05;Wald test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction) were identified at day 29 between patients who suffered a MACE (n=16) or not (n=85) post-hospitalization. Neutrophil elastase (ELANE), tissue factor pathways inhibitor (TFPI) and integrin subunit alpha-2 (ITGA2B) were significantly elevated in patients who suffered a MACE. Significantly enriched pathways associated with cardiovascular events included type I interferon signalling and neutrophil chemotaxis. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 patients who experienced a MACE demonstrated significant changes in peripheral blood transcriptome 29 days after hospital admission. Significant DEGs were related to neutrophil activity, coagulation and interferon signalling, suggesting a relationship between these pathways and increased cardiovascular risk.
ABSTRACT
Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) patients are immunocompromised due to defects in humoral/cellular immunity and immunosuppressive therapy. Reports indicate that the antibody (Ab) response in MM after 1 dose of SARS-CoV-2 RNA vaccine is attenuated. The impact of treatment on cellular immunity after vaccination remains unknown. Methods: We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 spike-binding (anti-S) IgG level in 320 MM patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 RNA vaccination. Blood and saliva were taken at multiple time points and compared with serology data of 69 age-matched vaccinated healthcare workers. We profiled SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses in a subset of 45 MM patients and 12 age-matched healthy controls by flow cytometry and ELIspot. All subjects were enrolled in studies approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Results: The 320 patients (median age 68 year) received two-dose RNA vaccines (69.1% BNT162b2, 27.2% mRNA-1273). Median time to diagnosis was 60 months with a median of 2 prior treatment lines (range 0-16). We included 23 patients with smoldering MM. Patients received various treatments at vaccination with 148 (43.8%) on anti-CD38-containing treatment, 36 (11.3%) on BCMA-targeted therapy and 59 (18.4%) not on active treatment (incl. SMM patients). At the last available evaluation prior to vaccination, 131 (40.9%) exhibited a complete response. At data cutoff, a total of 260 patients (81.3%) had anti-S IgG measured >10 days after the second vaccine (median 51 days). Of these, 84.2% mounted measurable anti-S IgG levels (median 149 AU/mL). In the control group, Ab levels were significantly higher (median 300 AU/mL). Ab levels in the vaccinated MM patients with prior COVID-19 were 10-fold higher than those of patients without prior COVID-19 (p<0.001). Repeat Ab measurements up to 60 days after second vaccination confirm delayed and suboptimal IgG kinetics, particularly in patients receiving anti-MM treatment compared to controls (Figure 1). MM patients on active treatment had lower anti-S IgG levels (p=0.004) compared to patients not on therapy (median 70 vs 183 AU/mL). Notably, 41 patients (15.8%) failed to develop detectable anti-S IgG: 24/41 (58.5%) were on anti-CD38, 13/41 (31.7%) on anti-BCMA bispecific Ab therapy and 4/41 (9.8%) >3 months after CAR T. Univariate analysis showed an association of disease-related factors with absence of anti-S IgG: more previous lines of treatment (>3 lines, p=0.035;>5 lines, p=0.009), receiving active MM treatment (p=0.005), grade 3 lymphopenia (p=0.018), receiving anti-CD38 therapy (p=0.042) and receiving BCMA-targeted therapy (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis (corrected for age, vaccine type, lines of treatment, time since diagnosis, response status and lymphopenia) confirmed that anti-CD38 (p=0.005) and BCMA-targeted treatment (p<0.001) are associated with not developing detectable anti-S IgG. Clinical relevance is emphasized by 10 cases of COVID-19 after 1 (n=7) or 2 vaccine doses (n=3, all without anti-S IgG) with 1 patient passing due to respiratory failure. We studied SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses >2 weeks after the second vaccine in 18 MM patients with undetectable anti-S IgG (seronegative), 27 with detectable anti-S IgG (seropositive) and 12 healthy seropositive controls. We found that seropositive MM patients had CD4+CD154+ T cells producing IFNg, TNFa and IL-2 at similar levels as controls, whereas in the seronegative MM cohort CD4 T cell responses were significantly reduced (p<0.005). SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 T cell responses were overall weaker and not different across cohorts. This data suggests that absence of detectable IgG is associated with suboptimal response of humoral and cellular immunity. Conclusion: MM patients mount a suboptimal IgG response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with 15.8% of patients without detectable anti-S IgG. Ongoing analyses will highlight durability of serological protection against COVID-19. Additional data on T cell responses and immunophenotyping in the context of vaccination will be upda ed at the meeting. Implications are continuation of non-pharmacological interventions, e.g. masking/social distancing, for vulnerable patients. The findings underscore a need for serological monitoring of MM patients after vaccination and for trials assessing use of prophylactic strategies or studies exploring additional immunization strategies. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Wang: Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy. Chari: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Pharmacyclics: Research Funding;GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Secura Bio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Antengene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding;Janssen Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Shattuck Labs: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding;AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cordon-Cardo: Kantaro: Patents & Royalties. Krammer: Kantaro: Patents & Royalties;Merck: Consultancy;Pfizer: Consultancy;Avimex: Consultancy;Seqirus: Consultancy. Jagannath: Legend Biotech: Consultancy;Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy;Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy;Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy;Sanofi: Consultancy;Takeda: Consultancy. Simon: Kantaro: Patents & Royalties. Parekh: Foundation Medicine Inc: Consultancy;Amgen: Research Funding;PFIZER: Research Funding;CELGENE: Research Funding;Karyopharm Inv: Research Funding.
ABSTRACT
Plaque rupture leads to a cascade of events culminating in collagen disruption, tissue factor release, platelet activation and thrombus formation. Pro-inflammatory conditions, hyperglycemia and smoking predispose to high thrombus burden (HTB) which is an independent predictor of slow or no-reflow. In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) reduce thrombus burden and improve myocardial perfusion. These agents are typically administered systemically via the intravenous route or locally via an intracoronary (IC) route. However, as higher local concentrations of GPI are associated with enhanced platelet inhibition, intralesional (IL) GPI administration may be particularly effective in cases of HTB. Modest-sized randomized trials comparing IL and IC GPI delivery have reported conflicting outcomes. Some trials have demonstrated improved coronary flow and myocardial perfusion with reduced major adverse cardiac events with IL compared with IC GPI administration, whereas others have shown no significant benefits. Furthermore, although no direct comparison has been made between IL delivery using an aspiration catheter, microcatheter or a dedicated balloon-based "weeping" infusion-catheter, improved outcomes have been most consistent following GPI administration at the site of the lesion and thrombus with the dedicated infusion catheter. This review provides an update on the role and outcomes of IL GPI administration in patients with AMI and HTB. Based on the evidence we offer an algorithm demonstrating when to consider IL administration in patients with AMI undergoing intervention. We conclude with a perspective on the management of patients with STEMI and COVID-19 in whom a prothrombotic state often results in HTB.